Review:
Mechanism
of action
The lipophilic nerve membrane diffuses local anesthetic agents in
its neutral, synthesized form. The bottom intra-cellular pH creates the ionized
active form that block the sodium channel by binding the asubunit portion of
the D4-S6 reversibly. The influx of sodium is decreased and membrane potential
upward trends slow. The threshold potential of 60 mV will not be exceeded,
unless a large amount of sodium channels are blocked. The resting membrane and
threshold potential remain identical, but the potential for action is
temporarily restricted. The syndical local anaesthetic also disrupts the inner
membrane of the channel and disordered membrane expansion in addition to its
effects on the intracellular porction of the sodium channel. Blocking of power
canals, calcium canals and G-protein-coupling receptors can also increase the
block. The affinity of the local anaesthetic varies in relation to the channel
statute, as the local anesthetic sites are revealed or obscured by
conformational changes. Affinity is generally highest if the sodium channel is
open or inactive, but not least if the channel is closed. Repeated stimulation
enables increasing amounts of local anaesthetic to access binding sites with a
gradual increase in blocks. In addition , there are different affinities among
individual local anesthesias, in addition to status-dependent differences in
channel affinities. Lidocaine binds quickly from the channel and distinguishes
it. Bupivacaine is binding quickly in comparison, but dissociating slower. Clinically,
it is of little interest to the neural barrier, but its effects on the
excitable cardiac conduction tissue are of considerable importance in
cardio-toxicity. Bupivacain can produce a variety of potentially lethal
arrythmias that are refractive to treatment through slow dissociation and
persistent blocks. Stereo-specific is this slow dissociation. R-bupivacaine is
more slowly separated from S-bupivacaine, which offers the latter an increased
safety margin[7].
Chemistry
A 'standard molecular' configuration consisting of a lipophilic
aromatic ring and a hydrophilic amine group is compatible with local
anaesthetic agents. These two parts are connected with a chain whose structure
can be used as an ester, amide, ketone or ether for the classification of the
agent. While everybody has local anesthetic properties, it has been clinically
effective for esters and amides. Therefore, molecules that lack this
traditional structure have local anaesthetic effects, such as amitryptyline and
meperidine. It is made up of cocaine, procaine, tetracaine and benzocaine, and
the lidocaine, bupivacain, prilocaine, ropivacaine and articaine are included
in the amides.
Lipid
solubility
The nerve membrane comprises lipid and lipoprotein matrix
membranes. This lipid-rich barrier needs local anesthetics to be able to gain
access to the sodium channel's intra-cellular portion. Therefore, lipid
solutions are an important factor in the determination of the drug's ability to
cross the membrane and reach target receptors. The relative distribution of the
local anaesthetic is quantified between the aqueous reference phase ( e.g.
water or a physiological pH buffer) and a non-aqueous solvent system (e.g.
octanol, z-heptane, haxane). The distribution of the substance between these
two phases allows the calculation of a coefficient of solvent partition. The
greater the dividing factor, the greater the lipid solubility and the easier it
will cross the membrane. Facility solubility has a strong connection to the
anesthetic potential of the local hydrocarbon group and the length of the
hydrocarbon chain. Less concentrations (0.1–0.75%) of highly lipid soluble
agents like bupivacaine compared with lower lipid soluble agents such as
prilocaine, which require higher concentrations (1–4%).
Protein binding
Plasma protein (albumin, a1 acid glycoprotein) and tissue protein
are bound on local anaesthetics. Albumin binding is weak but voluminous, with
high affinity but low amount of a1-acid glycopric. It has been shown that
protein binding correlates well with the length of the action. The plasma
concentration rises gradually as it binds to non-specified sites of defense as
local anesthesia become systemically ingested. After these sites are saturated,
the plasma concentration increases exponentially, which may cause toxicity.
When plasma pH drops, a similar situation occurs. Local anaesthetics dissociate
the protein molecules which cause the free fraction to rise suddenly.
Metabolism
Esthetic is less safe than among local anaesthetics. They are
rapidly hydrolysed by unspecified esterases in the plasma (and to a certain
extent the tissues). The speed of degradation provides security with rapidly
decreasing plasma levels. Hydrolysis metabolites are inert, but can be strong
allergens, including local anesthetics. The exception to plasma hydrolysis is
cocaine, which is metabolized slowly in the liver. Local anesthesia amide are
blood stable. The biotransformation mechanism is complex and is accompanied by
renal excretion by liver microsome enzymas. Phase I includes hydroxylation,
N-dealkylation and methylation and Phase II, in combination with amino amino
amino Metabolites.
Less involved metabolites and neutral acids. The rate of metabolism
varies between the quickest, intermediate, ropivacaine and bupivacaine agents
of prilocaine and etidocaine. Prilocaine clearance exceeds that where the liver
alone suggests other metabolism sites, most likely the lung[9].
GENERAL
PROPERTIES OF LOCAL ANESTHETICS
All local anesthetics have a
molecular structure of three parts: (a) lipophilic aroma, (b) intermediate
ester or amite connection, and (c) tertiary amine. Each component contributes
to the molecule with its distinct clinical properties. Figure 1. (Figure 1.)
Figure
1.Local anesthetic structure.
Anesthetic
Potency
Local anesthetics vary in strength, allowing usually concentrations
between 0.5% and 4%. This is mainly a result of lipid solubility differences
which boost the diffusion through nerve sheaths and neural membranes. The
aromatic ring and its substitution, as well as those applied to the tertiary
amine defines this property. For eg, bupivacane is less soluble and more active
than articaine, requiring 0.5% (5 mg / mL) versus 4% (40 mg / mL) concentration
to be formulated.
Time for
Onset
Greater lipid solubility of a drug not only increases the power,
but also allows for more rapid cell membranes diffusion. This accelerates the
beginning of anesthesia in isolated fiber in local anesthetics during in vitro
studies, but other factors must be appreciated. For instance, intrinsic
vasodilating properties might encourage systemic absorption before the nervous
membrane reaches the anesthetic. High lipid solubility can inhibit tissue fluid
spreading and can promote sequestration in neighboring adipose or myelin sheaths.
In each case, the neuronal membrane is delayed by the reduction of the number
of molecules. Consequently, unlike isolated fiber in vitro trials, higher lipid
solubility typically delays anesthesia in clinical settings. This can be offset
by the injection of higher concentrations that enable more molecules to reach
the membrane and accelerate start. While bupivacain and articaine are highly
lipid soluble both, the 4 percent articaine concentration provides a much
quicker incidence[10].
Although the amount of local anesthetic entering nerve fibers is
determined by various factors , the most important factor determining
anesthesia origins is the proportion of those compounds, which are in lipid
soluble rather than water-soluble state. In the form of a tertiary (3 bond)
that's lipid soluble, or a quaternary (4 bonds), the terminal amine described
in Figure 1 that exist which is charged positively and makes the molecule water
soluble. The local anesthetic base is formulated as hydrochloride salt to be
stable in solution. As a result, at the time of the infusion, the molecules are
quaternary, water-soluble and can not reach the neuron. Consequently, the start
time for local anesthesia is related to the proportion of the molecules that
transform in the physiological pH physiologically subjected to a tertiary lipid
soluble form (7.3). The ionizing constant (pKa) for the anesthesia defines this
proportion and measures it using the equation Henderson-Hasselbalch.
Simpler: if a local anesthetic were to have 7.4 pKa and be
introduced into tissues with a physiological pH of 7.4, 50% of the molecules in
the quaternary (cationic) form existed and only half of the molecules in the
tertiary form (unloaded) would be lipid soluble and capable of penetrating the
neuron. Unfortunately, the pKa is greater than 7,4 (physiological pH) for all
local antibiotics, so that more molecules are inserted into normal tissue in a
quaternary water-soluble form. The scientific hypothesis is that the higher the
pKa for a local anesthetic, the less lipid-soluble molecules are available.
This delays starting. The acidic condition of inflamed tissues lowers their pH
dramatically below 7.4, preferring the quaternary, water-soluble shape. In such
cases, for instance bupivacaine (pKa 8.1) could be less suitable than
mepivacaine (pKa 7.6). This has been proposed as the reason of
Nevertheless, it must be noted that as soon as the tertiary
molecules reach the neuron they are reionized into the quaternary form that is
due to the real sodium channel blockade. Figure 2 shows the sequence of events
leading to neural blockages[11].
Metabolism
and Elimination
A convenient basis to classify the local anaesthetics is the
intermediate chain or connection, which also determines their elimination
pattern. Amides in the liver are biologically transformed but plasma esterases
hydrolyze esters in the bloodstream. Local anesthesias of Ester are no longer
sold in dental cartridges and are not available in most topical anesthetic
formulations with the exception of benzocaine. In this way, Articaine is
exceptional. It is known as an amide, but contains also an ester side chain on
the aromatic ring. The hydrolysis of the side chain inactivates the molecule
and is thus equivalent to anesthetic ester.
Duration of
Action
Local anesthetics vary in duration because of differences in their
protein affinity. As other medications, local anesthetics bind the blood stream
to plasma proteins. This property is the percentage of the protein binding
circulating medication found to correspond to the sodium protein affinity of an
anesthetic. The higher the propensity to bind protein, the longer the
anesthetic is inhibited neuronally. Bupivacaine, for example, exhibits 95%
binding of protein compared with 55% for mepivacaene, and the difference in
neural blockage duration has been attributed to it.
The time a local anesthetic stays close to the neural fibres, also
influences anesthesia duration. Sequestration located of highly lipid-soluble
anesthetics may allow continuous release and prolongation into the neural
membranes, but this will mean a more significant constriction of the adjacent
vasculature. For this reason, many formulations are supplemented with
vasopressors to delay absorption and extend anesthesia. This is especially
important because the capacity of local anesthesia themselves to produce
vasodilation varies. Of starters, if used without vasopressants, lidocaine
shortens its own length, whereas mepivacain and bupivacaine do not. The
formulations for plain lidocain may be helpful for brief infiltration
procedures; however, their nerve block effectiveness is poor.
LOCAL
ANESTHETIC TOXICITY
Dose dependent is the systemic toxicity due to local anesthetics,
but it is not always easy to understand these doses. Unfortunately, the use of
anesthetic cartridges in dentistry has led to neglect to appreciate the
anesthetic we actually give in our patients. Unfortunately, through
undergraduate training and many well-respected dental journals this practice
still continues to be promoted. The volume of a dental cartridge is not a
dosage which is best represented as microgram or milligram. In addition, dental
cartridges often include 2 medicines, each with a separate dose and a local
anesthetic, and a vasopressor. Dental cartridges contain special volumes, such
as 1.7 or 1.8 ml, which further complicate matters. The sum of these problems
aim to memorize exact doses and not the actual understanding of appropriate
doses, and the dosages are memorized per card. This procedure is made even more
difficult as cartridges contain various local anesthetic and vasopressor
concentrations. To simplify dose calculations, the idea of cartridges should be
abandoned and the volume should be considered as 2 mL each. The number given to
a patient, which is a safe practice, is overestimated. For examples, estimate
it to be 9 mL if 4 1⁄2 cartridges were administered. This volume unit can be
translated more easily in milligram or in micrograph to the average dosage of
each drug as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.Approximation of Dosages
The local anesthetics being absorbed from the injection site are
increasing the blood stream concentration and the dose-dependent depletion of
the peripheral nervous system and central nervous system. Low levels of serum
are clinically used to suppress cardiac arrhythmia and seizures but higher
levels are ironically responsible for the seizure activity. (See figure 3.) The
primary life-threatening effect of local anesthetic spikes is convulsive
seizures. This is likely because the main inhibitory tracts are selectively
suppressed, which enable excitatory relations to run together. With further
serum concentrations increasing, all pathways are inhibited which lead to coma
and respiratory arrest. Lidocaine toxicity proof can begin at concentrations
> 5 μg / mL, but seizures normally include concentrations > 10 μg / mL.
[14] [12]
Figure 3. Approximate
serum concentrations and systemic influences of lidocaine.
Local anesthesia as depressant in CNS must be controlled and any
sedatives and opioid-related respiratory depression potentiated. In comparison,
if there are hypercarbons (high carbon dioxide), serum concentrations needed
for the production of seizures are smaller. This is the case because the
concomitant treatment of sedatives and antidepressants occurs in respiratory
distress. In pediatric patients receiving sedation from a surgery, Goodson and
Moore have reported disastrous effects of this drug interaction and unnecessary
local anesthetics
Even though all local anesthetics have a comparable risk of CNS
toxicity, the potential of bupivacain for direct cardiac toxicity is higher
than that of other agents. The theory is not fully known, but is expected to be
linked to the increased affinity of bupivacaine towards the inactive and
restful configurations of the sodium channel and the slower distance to these
channels. This delays regeneration, leaving heart tissue vulnerable to
arrhythmias. This is important for certain medical procedures during which
extremely high doses of bupivacaine are given. Doses up to the recommended
maximum of dental anesthesia have never been shown to occur[14].
Drug
Interactions
The most important of these involves possible improved
cardiovascular enhancement. Potential drug associations were extensively
explored in an earlier article in this journal35. The cardiotonic effects of
vasopressors found in the local anesthetic formation can be made more important
if patients are treated with any medicine that has similar influences. These
include antidepressant, digoxin, thyroid or any of our sympathomems used in
weight control or attention-deficiency disorders, tricyclic and monoamine
Oxidase inhibitors. Vasopressors in these patients are not contraindicated, but
must be provided with caution in a way that has been mentioned above for
patients with medical problems. It might be prudent to avoid vasopressors
entirely for patients accused of using stimulants, eg cocaine.
For those with Non-selective beta blockers, conscientious
application of vasopressants is often recommended. In comparison to selective
agents which only block heart beta-1, non-selective receptors often block
vascular beta-2 receptors. In these cases, vasopressor alpha agonists have a
more pronounced activity and a risky increased in both diastolic and mean blood
pressure. This is usually accompanied by a sudden heart rate reflex slowdown.
Important effects of these interactions are well known.36–,38 The interaction
with beta-blockers is close to the relationship with normal systemic
epinephrine responses. It starts after absorption from the site of the
injection, which usually peaks within five minutes and then decreases for 10-15
minutes. In certain patients who take non-selective beta blockers, vasopressors
should not be contraindicated; however, conservative and blood pressure doses
should be controlled regularly as mentioned above. It should be avoided to
impregnate Gingival retraction cables with racemic epinephrine. These drugs
contain epinephrine well above local anesthetic formulations[15]. These drugs
include epinephrine
Based on a study over the past 10 years, the findings show that
articaine has been the most researched and the amides used in dental local
anesthesia are also the most effective. It is likely to be attributed to the
fact that Articaine was not available in the US before 2000, while it was
already marketed in Europe in 1976. Articaine is not available in Europe. In
the USA we presented 20 of the 31 papers included in our report. While the
research did not fall under the scope of this paper, the authors do know that
articaine 's questionable reputation for post-operative paresthesia is a 4%
solution rather than a 2% dental anesthesia lidocaine[15], but it should be
noted that in vitro laboratory experiments are carried out in the area of
cell-l anesthesia. A study carried out in vitro by Mallet et al. has measured
the toxicity of 6 local anesthetic drugs on human neuroblastoma cells, and
identified Articaine as the least toxic amide, while a study carried out in
vitro by Perez-Castro et al. on neuronal cell lines has shown that bupivacaine
is the toxic amide. These findings are not consistent with the reports that
articaine is harmful in high concentrations, like 4%, and could lead to
paresthesia, as reported in two review articles. In the latter review, it must
be stressed that prilocaine can also cause potentially paresthesia[16]. It is
worth noting that almost always the clinical reports of paresthesia and
apparent toxicity involve anesthesia of the jaw blocks. We find it strange that
Articaine for example, only the second branch of the trigeminal nerve, would
have a high neurotoxic preference. This issue is not the purpose of the present
study, and it is certainly worthy of further consideration here.
It seems to us that none of the amides studied and used in dental
medicine , particularly not in the mandible, after the papings concerning the
effectiveness of dental local anesthetics, guarantee a 100% performance. It
could therefore be concluded that the administration technique is perhaps
ineffective and thus poorly efficient. The key to the effectiveness of local
anesthesia in the mandible could be intraosseous anesthesia.
References
1.
Koller C. Historical notes on the beginning of local anaesthesia. JAMA
1928;90:1742–3
2.
Xiong Z, Strichartz GR. Inhibition by local anesthetics of Ca2+ channels in rat
anterior pituitary cells. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;363(1):81–90.
3. Berde CB, Strichartz GR. Local anesthetics.
In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, et al., editors. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa:
Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2009
4. Katzung BG, White PF. Local anesthetics. In:
Katzung BG, Masters SB, Trevor AJ, editors. Basic
and Clinical Pharmacology. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Companies Inc; 2009
5. Nakai Y, Milgrom P, Mancl L, Coldwell SE,
Domoto PK, Ramsay DS. Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental
practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1699–1705
6. Malamed SF. Techniques of maxillary
anesthesia. In: Malamed SF, editor. Handbook of
local anesthesia. 5th ed. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2004.
pp. 189–225.
7. selective
effects of the enantiomers of bupivacaine on the electrophysiological
properties of the guinea-pig papillary muscle. Br J Pharmacol 1991;103(1):1275–81.
8.
Acalovschi I, Cristea T. Intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine.
Anesth Analg 1995;81(3):539–43.
9.
Albright GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or
bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1979;51(4): 285–7.
10. Scott DB, Jebson PJR, Braid DP, et al. Factors affecting
plasma levels of lignocaine and prilocaine. Brit J
Anaesth. 1972;44:1040–1049.
11. Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H, Levin LM, et al. The
pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with 1 ∶ 100,000 and 1 ∶ 200,000 epinephrine. J Am Dent
Assoc. 2006;137:1562–1571.
12. Benz EJ. Disorders of hemoglobin. In: Longo DL, Kasper
DL, Jameson JL, et al., editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal
Medicine. 18th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2012.
13. Schatz M. Adverse reactions to local
anesthetics. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 1992;12:585–609.
14. Goodson JM, Moore PA. Life-threatening reactions
after pedodontic sedation: an assessment of narcotic, local anesthetic and
antiemetic drug interactions. J Am Dent
Assoc. 1983;107:239–245.
15. Piccinni C,
Gissi DB, Gabusi A, Montebugnoli L, Poluzzi E. Paraesthesia after local
anaesthetics: An analysis of reports to the fda adverse event reporting
system. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;117:52–56.
16. Garisto GA,
Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC, Haas DA. Occurrence of paresthesia after
dental local anesthetic administration in the united states. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:836–844.
No comments:
Post a Comment